Why did God make rainbows?

Rainbowbanner3

Mysteries can be solved. Just ask questions that begin with "How" instead of "Why". 

John Hobby is a reader of the blog and a Facebook pal, and the other night he told me a little story about rainbows. I'd like to share it with you today.

"As a young man I was taught that rainbows were God's promise never to flood the Earth again, and it stifled my curiosity about it. I was like "Oh okay, that's nice of God to remind us during rain storms, nothing else to know there.""

"But I do remember thinking that it was a contradiction, because I had seen rain storms cause flooding; especially in the desert where I grew up."

So after hearing that tale I did some poking around, and wouldn't you know it, the rainbow/flood myth goes all the way back to the bible. The reason that rainbows were the topic of our discussion was because John had already shared a recording of an MIT lecture earlier that evening; a lecture about the real physics of rainbows. While the video was an exciting lesson on the geometry within a common phenomenon, somehow John's personal story of divine promises gone unfulfilled, captured my imagination the most.

Read the rest of this post »

A Great Gift Idea for Your Kids

Tysoncrop

I can't even attempt to describe to you all how busy I've been the last two weeks, because I literally don't have the time to describe it.  Yes.  That busy.

Anyway, I apologize for my absence from the blog, and I promise to write some preachy, heavy handed, and boring diatribes when the pressure's off.  For now however, I'll let someone far more accomplished do my preaching for me.

Please parents, take this man's words to heart.  Neil Degrasse Tyson is an astrophysicist and popularizer of science, and in this one short clip he summarizes why I think it's so important to raise my kids around science.  In fact, he sort of summarizes the whole reason for the existence of this blog.

So have a watch, and consider giving your kids the gift of critical thinking this year.

Unhealthy Vibrations

Hippies
Why Hippy Health-Care isn't Cute

After I released 'A Love Song for Love Songs' last week, I wondered what to do next.  It certainly was my most popular post to date, and the attention, while not overwhelming, did garner some traffic and hopefully a few new readers to this paltry web log.  So a natural question followed.  Where to take these new readers next?

Should I continue in the vein that led them to the blog in the first place?  Obviously ALSFLS was written from a fairly positive viewpoint, and I hope that people found it somewhat uplifting, if not entertaining.  It was designed to be inclusive of everyone, and I took great care to make sure nobody would walk away from it feeling as if their world-view had been challenged.  Yet as any regular reader would know, that's something I often do.  Skepticism is not inherently confrontational, but by the skeptic's acceptance of only that for which there is compelling evidence, and therefore the rejection of pseudoscientific or faith-based claims, often people find skeptics to be just that.

Read the rest of this post »

Left and Right and Wrong

Politics: Ignore it, and it will go away.

Radar-politics-cover
I know this educated, older gentleman of some local celebrity who absolutely detests right wing political thinking.  At least, that's the editorial bent one can glean from the regular items he chooses to share on Facebook.  His background is in the arts, and he's quite involved in Toronto's local music scene, yet he seems to spend all his time hunting down Huffington Post articles that support his ideology.  He uses his lengthy social networking friend list to advance a very definite agenda of liberalism.

To be clear, if there are only two checkboxes in which to define one's philosophical identity, I'd have to choose liberalism over conservatism.  When I was younger the choice would have been much more clear to me, and I'd have spent little time, if any, mincing words about exactly what those ideas mean.  Youth is great fuel for the passions, and liberal concepts like equality, altruism, and free speech seemed like wonderful things to be passionate about.  Furthermore, I've always believed in the educational principles laid out by the liberal arts, and equated liberalism with progressive-humanism directly.  In short, I believed that leftist thinking was the most direct road possible to a freer, fairer, and more hospitable society in which mankind could live.  Nowadays however, despite the fact that I have few beefs with liberal ideas, it seems increasingly true that I find liberals themselves somewhat grating. 

Read the rest of this post »

Reason is No Reason

Banner

Many of my blog posts so far, while mostly rambling and nonsensical, have focused on issues pertaining to science and reason.  While I doubt that a single one of them has been read end-to-end, and that most have been disregarded entirely, I've at least attempted to chronicle my thoughts on these ideas, for better or worse.

Why do so, beyond an overt attempt to bore some and ostracize others, you might ask?  I've picked up hints that some people, made up at least partly by those who disagree with the conclusions I've drawn, would consider me at best long-in-the-tooth, and at worst a pompous ass.  Since both of these assertions are largely accurate, I won't attempt to dispel them.  

Read the rest of this post »

Solemn Summer Vibes

Heat

How awesome is the summertime? Ok, we ain't there yet, but in Toronto this week it certainly feels that way. I mean, 30 degrees in May? Bring it on.

But you have to wonder at what cost this joy is delivered. If science is anything to judge reality by, one has to accept that man-made global warming is part of that reality. And while I'm certainly not someone to take a hot day or two, or even a sampling of a few years, and take it for more than it's statistically worth, one has to at least wonder if those few precious degrees we're all currently enjoying aren't at least small evidence of a trend.

Nothing new, everyone's heard it and thought it themselves. And while this narrow period in time isn't likely to be representative of anything in particular, I'm probably not alone in sensing an odd overall trend in our climate. From a biased and unscientific viewpoint, there seems to be present a tangible effect to go along with all the data.

As I've hinted at before, what scares me isn't the greenhouse effect, but the possibility of a runaway greenhouse effect. For those unaware, that's when a planet hits a certain 'tipping point' beyond which the greenhouse effect begins a sort of feedback loop, continually building up CO2 and water vapour in the atmosphere and turning an Earth-like heaven into a Venus-like hell.

Media_httpwwwcosmogra_ktziv

Who knows how likely such an event is, but we can be sure that even the best efforts to understand where that tipping point is are just educated guesses. Again, the sample size is too small. We've only ever lived on one planet and have no case studies to examine. Could we see into Venus' past we could know more, but alas, it ain't happening.

So what can be done? Are there realistic solutions? Of course there are, in that any plan that includes our survival, as opposed to the alternative, is obviously worth the time. But they're hard choices, be sure. Don't listen to the polarized extremes of any debate, and while I consider myself fairly liberal, those that claim biofuels and farmer's markets as a solution to all that ails the earth are either ignorant of the truth, or selling something.

The sacrifices required to affect real change on a system so huge and so fantastically out-of-whack are massive. Neglect can do more damage, and faster, than design can easilly repair.

Nonetheless, it is design that will save us, if anything can. While technology is in many ways the source of the problem, one must admit that it's also the defining characteristic of homo sapiens, and so any effort to preserve our species must also preserve that aspect of our nature. We, from the making of the first stone tool, are compelled to create technology. If we are to survive, we must create the technology to do so.

Now, everything I've said so far could perhaps be seen as alarmist, and I will admit that while there's a scientific consensus that global warming is a real and man-made effect, there's less compelling evidence on what will happen next.  Yes, a runaway effect is a possibility, but so is a slight warming of the atmosphere with nary an ice cap melted.  Many of the horror stories that colour people's perceptions of this topic are somewhat speculative. The evidence tells us that something definitely wacky is going on and that we caused it, but isn't clear on what all of that means.

So here's the thing. I like playing my PS3, and I work in an electronically powered medium. Energy consumption is a big part of my little life, and that's unlikely to change. And while I do what I can when I think of it, and use no more energy than I can comfortably and conscientiously afford to, I'm probably a worse offender than most.

Sissys_hot_summer_poster_01aa
We know that it will take a huge investment in the research and technology required, and thus far each generation aware of this trend has opted out of dealing with it, and left it to their children to handle.  So I'm curious about how we begin to summon that massive will, and getting change going.  I could never turn on my PS3 again, but all that might do is make me feel better about myself.  For something truly world-changing, we need a plan to motivate the people of earth to spend the coin.

 

Previously, I believed political consciousness raising was the answer, and that a political sea-change could, and even eventually would, bring about the societal paradigm shift required to make a difference. Much of the reason that I am a liberal isn't centered on current civil rights issues, important as I think they are, but rather on concerns for the long term benefit of our species. I thought that the progress of liberalism, since it was traditionally associated with environmental concerns, was linearilly corelated to the progression of those concerns. That a vote for change meant actual change, so to speak. 

But I now realize that politics is too hampered a process, that popular opinion is too easilly distracted by small issues. No matter how much good a man like Barack Obama may want to do in his most private wishes, his efforts to pursue such an agenda must include compromise to such an extent that change can be no more than mind-numbingly slow at the very best.

Politics is a reactionary medium, only a meager reflection of the public will, and it's only when the public will demands action that action is ever taken.

So all I'm left with, beyond the ridiculously optimistic idea that buying organic foods will inspire the emerging Chinese middle class to do the same, is the consciousness raising of reason.

How do I get there, you may ask? What does good thought have to do with saving the whales?

Everything.

Media_httpitodyasofil_qzlbt

It's only through reason that we can largely disregard the emotion-crafting rhetoric that is political debate. It takes critical thinking to ignore the arguments of the politicized interests on the issue, and actually look at the facts. Ten politicians providing context on the environmental discussion aren't worth one researcher describing his or her findings. Instead of designing solutions mankind is spinning its wheels, embroiled in nonsense talk.

Only once we, as a collective people, get educated and truly understand the gadgetry of how we fucked ourselves, can we begin to develop the stone tools required to meet the challenge. If the debate can shift from a choice between fantasy and reality to a choice between constructive options, we at least have a chance to die trying.

These are the things I hope we can begin to think about, even on a pleasant, but concerningly warm, May evening.